📊 Backtest📒 Journal Updated 29/09/2026
← 🔥 Turbo
📐 Simulate Position
STALE?Report written 7 days ago · at $2.12entry levels may be stale — re-check before acting

RZLV

ค่าขนมSMALL CAP
Rezolve AI PLC · NASDAQ · Technology / AI Software (Agentic Commerce)
$2.12
▼ 2.75%
MCap $884M
Down 2.75% today at $2.12, just $0.07 above the 52-week low ($2.05) and down ~17.5% from the $2.57 the prior (Aug 4) report was written against — a period spanning both the Sept 1 H1 print (revenue ~20x YoY, guidance reaffirmed) and the Sept 23 cost-cut announcement. Net negative drift despite the growth headline is direct evidence the going-concern deficit escalation, not execution, is now the dominant driver of the stock.
BusinessAgentic AI commerce platform · H1 2026 revenue $130.8M (~20x YoY), $360M FY26 guide reaffirmed · TCS/Zilch/Microsoft/Tech Mahindra reseller partnerships plus a new Google data-platform selection · going-concern working-capital deficit MORE THAN DOUBLED to $205.2M in the Sept 1 6-K (from $87.1M in the Mar 2026 20-F) — trading near its 52-week low
Thesis

The prior report's Oct 7 'Q3 earnings' catalyst never happens as such — RZLV is a UK-domiciled foreign private issuer that files an H1 6-K and an annual 20-F, not US-style quarterly reports; TipRanks lists the next full financial report as ~Apr 29, 2027 (FY2026). The real events since the last report were the Sept 1, 2026 H1 6-K (revenue $130.8M, ~20x YoY, $360M FY26 guide reaffirmed) and the Sept 23 cost-cut announcement targeting $60M in annualized savings and positive adjusted EBITDA by H1 2027. ⚠️ SURVIVAL: the Sept 1 filing shows the going-concern working-capital deficit MORE THAN DOUBLED to $205.2M (from $87.1M in the Mar 2026 20-F) on a $139.5M H1 net loss, with accumulated deficit now $499.1M; cash was $100.5M as of Jun 30 against an active $39.9M ATM program and a just-completed $250M registered offering already diluting the share count. Roth Capital cut its target to $6.50 from $9.50 on the print — the market's read is net negative despite the 20x revenue beat. This stays in the turbo lane because the growth is independently verified and Oct 6, 2026's Investor Day is a genuine near-term proof point for the cost-cut plan, but the asymmetry has shifted materially toward the downside since Aug: scoreLabel downgraded from Moonshot to ค่าขนม, sizing cut to 2%.

📝 Primary Verdict · Core Holding
SPECULATIVEค่าขนม

ค่าขนม — downgraded from the prior report's Moonshot label. Measured turbo entry-timing data shows a median -13.7% return from report price to just after catalyst (n=19), so Entry 1 is NOT preferred; wait for the $1.95-2.05 zone at/near the 52-week low. The going-concern working-capital deficit more than doubled since the last report ($87.1M to $205.2M) even as revenue grew ~20x — this is now genuinely a survival story first, growth story second. Sized to 2%, well below a standard moonshot allocation.

73
score / 100 ⓘ
⚡ Catalyst
🎯 Investor Day7 DAYS

Company-scheduled Oct 6, 2026 Investor Day — the real near-term test, replacing the prior report's mistaken 'Q3 earnings' framing (RZLV does not file US-style quarterly reports). Needs to show credible early execution on the $60M annualized cost-savings plan and a believable path to the stated H1 2027 positive-adjusted-EBITDA target, or the going-concern discount widens further.

Oct 6, 2026
💰 Cost-Cut / Profitability PathONGOING

Sept 23, 2026 announcement targets ~$60M in annualized cost savings and positive adjusted EBITDA by H1 2027 — management's direct response to the widened going-concern deficit. Forward promise, not yet proven; ongoing driver through every filing from here.

Ongoing
🤝 Enterprise Reseller Ramp (TCS / Zilch / Microsoft / Tech Mahindra + new Google selection)ONGOING

H1 growth is credited to TCS/Zilch/Microsoft resale partnerships; since then Rezolve added a Google selection for its distributed-database platform (Aug 25) and a Tech Mahindra global alliance (Aug 28) — an ongoing distribution catalyst if H2 deal flow keeps tracking toward the $360M guide.

Ongoing
🎯 Entry Point
Entry 1
$2.12
Current price — near the 52-week low ($2.05), but measured turbo entry-timing data argues for confirmation before adding, not chasing hereScale in (small starter only)
Entry 2PREFERRED
$1.95–2.05
At/near the 52-week low — best R/R if Oct 6's Investor Day underwhelms and the stock re-tests the low before any relief rallyIf dips
Entry 3
$1.50
Deep capitulation — further dilution, escalated going-concern language, or a weak Investor Day updateDeep dip only
✅ Take Profit
TP1
Base — Oct 6 shows credible early progress on the $60M cost-savings plan and going-concern language stabilizes (not escalates) in the next filing. Written against a +72.7pp optimism bias measured on turbo Base scenarios (skill-feedback, n=41); assumes a ~4-5 month horizon through H2 2026 cost-cut proof points, not the 30-day North Star window
$3.6
+70%
TP2
Bull — clean Investor Day plus visible early progress toward the H1 2027 EBITDA-positive target
$5.3
+150%
TP3 🌙
Moon — going-concern language is removed from the next annual filing, EBITDA-positive path confirmed, stock re-tests the 52-week high ($7.58)
$7.42
+250%
🔴 Stop Loss
Tight Stop
Wider than the turbo lane's overall medianMAE (-24.1%) — justified further given the going-concern deficit more than doubling since the last report (catalystType earnings_beat has only n=2 in the skill-feedback data, too thin to use its own bucket figure)
$1.48
-30.2%
Hard Stop
Coincides with the Bear scenario — near-total-loss / delisting-risk territory if the going-concern mitigation plan visibly fails
$0.95
-55.2%
Risk / Reward
Entry 2 (dip, ~$2.00 mid) to hard stop vs TP2 (Bull case)
3.1 : 1
⚠ Below the 5:1 turbo target and notably lower than the prior report's paper 19.5:1 — the going-concern deficit doubling means the real tail risk is dilution/insolvency, not a stop-loss breach; size accordingly
📅 Estimate Date
Investor Day
Needs to show credible early execution on the $60M cost-savings plan and a believable path to H1 2027 EBITDA positivity — not just repeat the $360M revenue guide
Oct 6, 2026
Cost-cut progress expected; going-concern language needs to stabilize, not escalate
FY2026 Full-Year Results (20-F)
The actual next full audited financial report per TipRanks — far outside this report's near-term catalyst window, included so the Oct 6 Investor Day isn't mistaken for a GAAP checkpoint
~Apr 29, 2027
n/a
📈 Possible Up % — Scenario Spread
Bear
-55%
$0.95
Base
+70%
$3.6
Bull
+150%
$5.3
Moon
+250%
$7.42
← downsideupside →
🏛️ Fed / Macro Risk — HIGH

Assesses how Fed policy / interest rates / inflation affect this stock — LOW = minimal risk, HIGH = proceed with caution

Rate Outlook
The Fed hiked 25bps to 3.75-4.00% on Sept 16, 2026 (unanimous 12-0) — a real shift from the prior report's dovish-leaning read — with 16 of 18 policymakers seeing room for at least one more hike in 2026. Next FOMC is Oct 28, 2026, three weeks after RZLV's own Investor Day. Higher-for-longer rates directly raise the cost of the debt refinancing and further ATM issuance the going-concern mitigation plan already depends on.
Inflation
The Sept 16 hike itself was explicitly justified by inflation remaining elevated above the 2% target — a headwind for unprofitable growth software valuations broadly, and specifically for a company whose survival plan leans on cheap capital access.
Sector Impact
RZLV's own going-concern/dilution overhang matters far more than macro right now, but a genuinely hawkish, still-hiking Fed makes every dollar of the debt refinancing / ATM issuance in the mitigation plan more expensive and more dilutive at the margin.
Summary
HIGH — the Fed hiked (not held) on Sept 16 with guidance toward more hikes, materially worse than the prior report's macro read, layering onto RZLV's own company-specific survival risk. The combination raises the real cost of the capital-raising RZLV's own going-concern mitigation plan depends on.
🎯 Analyst Targets

Wall Street price targets vs the current price — cross-check our TP levels

Consensus (TipRanks, Moderate Buy)
Moderate Buy$10.42+392%
Roth Capital
Buy (cut from $9.50 post-H1 print)$6.5+207%
current price $2.12
🔍 Similar-Catalyst Comparable Check

Stocks that went through similar catalyst events — calibrate whether the +30%+ target is realistic

RZLV❌ BadSept 2026
-17.5%
in 28 days
Sept 1 H1 2026 print (revenue ~20x YoY, guidance reaffirmed) + Sept 23 cost-cut announcement — going-concern deficit more than doubles to $205.2M
Own-company precedent showing the market now discounts even a very strong revenue beat once the going-concern deficit escalates — net price action was negative across both the H1 print and the follow-up mitigation announcement, the clearest evidence yet that survival risk now dominates the growth narrative.
BBAI❌ BadMay 2025
-11.3%
in 1 day
Q1 2025 EPS/revenue miss — dilution-risk AI micro-cap punished on a bad print
BigBear.ai, a similarly dilution/ATM-dependent AI micro-cap, fell 11.3% the day after missing Q1 2025 estimates — a real base rate for how a weak update could hit RZLV given its own going-concern overhang.
BBAI✅ GoodMar 2026
+0%
in 0 days
ATM-funded balance-sheet turnaround — 90%+ debt reduction, $693M raised via equity facilities, ended FY2025 with $462M cash
Shows an ATM/dilution-dependent AI micro-cap can use the same mechanism RZLV is now relying on to genuinely fix its balance sheet rather than just delay failure — the bull-case survival path for RZLV's own mitigation plan.
GOEV❌ BadJan 2025
-99%
in 365 days
Going-concern doubt disclosed but never resolved — Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing and Nasdaq delisting
Canoo disclosed the same kind of going-concern language RZLV's filings now carry at a larger and worsening scale, was unable to secure sufficient additional funding, and ultimately filed Chapter 7 and was delisted — the real tail-risk case now that RZLV's own working-capital deficit has more than doubled in a single filing period.
⚡ Optional Layer · Tactical Overlay
🎯 Catalyst Spot Mode

Short-term play around the catalyst (Sep 2026 earnings) only — an optional overlay, not a verdict that ranks equal to the Core Holding.

⚠️

Use this stop-loss set (-30% / -35%) only when trading the earnings spot — not for the core holding (use the -30.2% / -55.2% set above). If you are holding long-term, follow the core set.

📈Pre-Catalyst Run-up Pattern
0% to +5% pre-event driftMinimal pre-event drift; the move is expected to happen on the event itself

RZLV continues to trade near its own 52-week low heading into Oct 6 — minimal pre-event drift expected. The credibility/going-concern gap means the market is waiting for the event itself rather than positioning ahead of it, the same pattern that produced only a muted reaction to the Sept 1 H1 print.

🎲Historical Post-Catalyst Move
✅ Catalyst Winavg +5%
range: -5% to +10%· Sept 1-23, 2026 (RZLV, cumulative)
The isolated day-of reaction to the Sept 1, 2026 H1 print was not cleanly separable in this research pass, but the stock is down a cumulative ~17.5% from $2.57 (Aug 3) to $2.12 (Sept 29) across the period spanning both the H1 print and the Sept 23 cost-cut announcement — net negative, materially worse than the prior report's muted-but-flat +3.1% framing. Roth Capital cutting its target to $6.50 from $9.50 on the print is direct evidence the going-concern deficit escalation is now outweighing the revenue beat in the market's read. NOTE: catalystType earnings_beat has only n=2 in the turbo skill-feedback dataset — Tier 1, context only, no tier2 directive applies.
❌ Catalyst Missavg -30%
range: -11% to -99%· May 2025 (BBAI) / Jan 2025 (GOEV)
BigBear.ai (BBAI), a similarly ATM/dilution-dependent AI micro-cap, fell 11.3% the day after missing Q1 2025 estimates. The more relevant tail case is now Canoo (GOEV): disclosed the same going-concern language RZLV's deficit now mirrors at a larger scale, was never able to resolve it, and was delisted after a Chapter 7 filing — the real downside case now that RZLV's own deficit has more than doubled in one filing period.
💼Spot Position Sizing
How the recommended % is derived
2%
of portfolio

The going-concern working-capital deficit more than doubled since the last report ($87.1M to $205.2M) alongside an active ATM and a just-completed $250M registered offering — sizing cut to 2% (from the prior report's 3%) even though the underlying revenue growth (~20x YoY) remains real and independently verified.

🛑Stop Loss · Spot Trade
Spot cut-loss levels — separate from the core holding
Before Catalyst
-30%($1.48)
Wider than the turbo overall medianMAE (-24.1%) — justified further given the escalated going-concern disclosure since the last report
After Catalyst (Bad Result)-35%
If Oct 6 shows no credible progress on the $60M savings plan, or going-concern language escalates again in any filing, exit — the mitigation plan is a forward promise, not yet proven
📎 Sources

Generated 2026-09-29 · Not financial advice